Jump directly to the content
FATAL FLAW

Europe’s failure to give AstraZeneca Covid jab ‘could be to blame for soaring cases and lockdowns’

EUROPE’S failure to give the AstraZeneca Covid jab to elderly people could be why the continent is seeing a new wave, a vaccine boss has suggested.

Several countries are facing fresh lockdowns because infections are so high and hospitals are coming under strain due to the influx of admissions.

Police officers walk in front of a protest against lockdown in Austria
5
Police officers walk in front of a protest against lockdown in AustriaCredit: AP
Pascal Soriot, the chief executive officer of AstraZeneca, has said the UK is not seeing many hospitalisations compared with Europe. He suggested this was because it used the AZ Covid jab in the elderly
5
Pascal Soriot, the chief executive officer of AstraZeneca, has said the UK is not seeing many hospitalisations compared with Europe. He suggested this was because it used the AZ Covid jab in the elderlyCredit: Getty

New restrictions and threats of mandatory vaccines in Austria and Germany has caused outrage and protests across the region.

But the UK, while seeing high Covid case numbers, has not recorded drastic hospital admissions or deaths for months - despite hundreds of people becoming unwell every day.

Vaccines have largely broken the link between infections and severe illness that so strongly existed before.

Pascal Soriot, the chief executive officer of AstraZeneca, has suggested this is because the UK used the company’s Covid jab, created by Oxford University, to protect the elderly.

He told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: “It's really interesting when you look at the UK - there was a big peak of infections, but not so many hospitalisations relative to Europe. 

“In the UK, this vaccine was used to vaccinate older people. Whereas in Europe, people initially thought the vaccine didn't work in elderly people.”

Asked if this was a mistake on Europe’s part that had led to the current wave of infections, Mr Soriot said: “I’m not saying there was any mistake by anybody. 

“But there is still a lot of data that needs to be made available that we don't have.”

The EU shunned the AZ jab in the early days of the vaccine rollouts while the UK raced to get doses into arms from December 2020.

A number of countries initially refused to use it in people over the age of 65, concerned that there was not enough data that it was effective.

It wasn’t until March - three months after the UK - that France and Germany eventually approved the jab for elders.

Then came the investigations into blood clots caused by the jab, which led to a series of European countries pausing their rollouts in a domino effect.

The move baffled scientists, with the World Health Organization urging nations to keep using the jab until there was more concrete evidence. 

After a “plausible link” was found in risk of blood clots in younger adults, most European countries altered their guidance so that only older people were advised to get the jab, including the UK.

But Denmark completely ditched the life-saving jab.

European countries have mostly focused on using Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines, with a mix of Johnson & Johnson, China’s Sinopharm vaccine and Russia’s Sputnik V. 

In the UK, first and second doses of AZ and Pfizer have almost been equally split. Booster shots are almost entirely Pfizer, due to the blood clot risk.

Scientists said directly comparing different vaccines used in countries with their own epidemics is very difficult, and therefore it is almost impossible to say if any work significantly better than others.

Mr Soriot claimed the AstraZeneca vaccine produced a greater immune response than other Covid vaccines due to a surge in T cells.

T cells are a part of the immune system that are thought to give the longest protection against bugs, potentially years, but are not as easy to test for as antibodies.

Asked if the AstraZeneca vaccine was why there had been fewer hospitalisations in the UK, Mr Soriot said: “What I am saying is that T cells do matter and in particular it relates to the durability of the response, especially in older people. 

“And this vaccine has been shown to stimulate T cells to a higher degree in older people. 

“And so we haven't seen many hospitalisations in the UK - a lot of infections for sure, everyone's talking about those.

“But what matters is are you severely ill or not? Are you hospitalised or not? And we haven’t seen so many of these hospitalisations in the UK.”

Hospital admissions per population (million) across Europe since the summer
5
Hospital admissions per population (million) across Europe since the summerCredit: Our World In Data
The UK's weekly hospital admission rate compared to Europe as of November 14
5
The UK's weekly hospital admission rate compared to Europe as of November 14Credit: Our World In Data

Mr Soriot explained: “The T cell response takes a little longer to come in, but it's actually more durable. It lasts longer.

“Everybody is focused on antibodies, but you see those decline over time. 

“What remains, and is very important, is this T cell response, and as soon as the virus attacks you, they wake up and come to the rescue and defend you. 

“So you may be infected but they come to the rescue and you don't get hospitalised.”

Dr Peter English, Chair of the BMA Public Health Medicine Committee until October 2020, said it was "plausible" that T-cell protection is holding the UK up.

But he said he would "be very interested to see the evidence on which this claim is based".

Previous studies have shown the AZ jab is more effective at generating T-cells than vaccines like the Pfizer and Moderna ones, which use different technology called mRNA.

For exmaple, scientists from Oxford and Switzerland said in July that T-cell protection is a “key feature” of adenovirus vaccines like the Oxford and J&J jabs.

However, scientists say that in the real world, it's not clear what impact this has on the epidemic.

One study (COMCOV) found that although the AZ jab induced more T cells than Pfizer, shortly after two doses, the level is almost the same.

Prof Eleanor Riley, Professor of Immunology and Infectious Disease, The University of Edinburgh, said: "It does seem, from a growing number of clinical trials, that the mRNA vaccines initially induce higher levels of neutralising antibodies than the Oxford AZ vaccine.

"It also seems that the Oxford AZ vaccine initially induces higher levels of T cells than the mRNA vaccines.

“However, getting good data on this is complicated.

"The different vaccines have been rolled out at different times and in different groups of people with different underlying risks of severe disease, making direct comparison between them very difficult."

READ MORE SUN STORIES

Dr Lance Turtle, Senior Clinical Lecturer and Consultant Physician in Infectious Diseases, University of Liverpool, said: “At the moment, it is not possible to say for certain whether the AZ Covid-19 vaccine is better than any other vaccine.

"Based on the real-world experience this is unlikely to be the case. If it is the case the difference will probably be small."

Vaccine types used in Europe. The UK has been almost equally split for the AstraZeneca and Pfizer jabs
5
Vaccine types used in Europe. The UK has been almost equally split for the AstraZeneca and Pfizer jabsCredit: Statista
There is a risk of a new Covid variant in Europe, EU chief says

We pay for your stories!

Do you have a story for The Sun news desk?

Email us at [email protected] or call 0207 782 4104. You can WhatsApp us on 07423 720 250. We pay for videos too.

Click here to upload yours.

Topics