Jump directly to the content
CREAM OF THE CROP

Spend a mint on luxury beauty products? Here’s why they might not actually work

LUXURY beauty creams that promise an array of age-defying effects might not actually work “in real life”, a TV investigation has claimed.

Channel 4’s Supershoppers examined products by high-end brands, and discovered the benefits touted are often based on test tube results, the reported.

 Supershoppers presenters Anna Richardson, left, and Andi Osho have examined the claims touted by luxury beauty products
5
Supershoppers presenters Anna Richardson, left, and Andi Osho have examined the claims touted by luxury beauty productsCredit: TV Company

Dr Colin Sanders, a leading cosmetic chemist who appeared on the show, warned that beauty companies are “jumping the gun” to make scientific claims from “in vitro” (controlled environment) testing.

He said it is quite common for creams to work in a laboratory but not on human skin.

Estee Lauder’s Advanced Multi-Protection Anti-Oxidant Crème is advertised as defending against “the appearance of premature ageing” – but this claim is based on in vitro testing.

 Estee Lauder’s Advanced Multi-Protection Anti-Oxidant Crème is tested 'in vitro' (in a controlled lab environment)
5
Estee Lauder’s Advanced Multi-Protection Anti-Oxidant Crème is tested 'in vitro' (in a controlled lab environment)Credit: Estee Lauder

The 50ml moisturiser, which costs £44, “reduces the look of first signs of ageing, like dullness and fine, dry lines [and] refreshes skin with lasting hydration”, according to the promotional material.

Dr Sanders commented: “It's quite common for something to work in vitro and not work in real life at all - so really to use an in vitro claim on a pack is jumping the gun a bit, so I don't think it really should be something you can use to promote a product.”

The Estee Lauder website states that the product is “in vitro” tested.

 Estee Lauder’s Advanced Night Repair Serum is dermatologist tested, the show revealed
5
Estee Lauder’s Advanced Night Repair Serum is dermatologist tested, the show revealedCredit: Estee Lauder
 Neal’s Yard’s Rehydrating Rose Facial Polish is dermatologically tested, which means it is not necessarily examined by a qualified skin doctor
5
Neal’s Yard’s Rehydrating Rose Facial Polish is dermatologically tested, which means it is not necessarily examined by a qualified skin doctorCredit: Neal's Yard Remedies

The documentary asked Estee Lauder if they had based the product claims on anything other than laboratory testing.

A spokesperson commented: “Estée Lauder fully stands behind all of its product performance claims, which are supported by testing that includes clinical and consumer testing on real women as well as in vitro laboratory testing.”

Presenters Anna Richardson and Andi Osho also cut through the scientific jargon often used on luxury products.

 Anna and Andi also examined the type of language often used on high-end creams to find out what it really means
5
Anna and Andi also examined the type of language often used on high-end creams to find out what it really meansCredit: Glasgow UK

The pair examined , which is dermatologically tested, and , which is dermatologist tested.

“Dermatologist tested” means the test was supervised by a qualified skin doctor, while “dermatologically tested” means anyone could have examined it.

Neal’s Yard was asked if they thought the test was sufficient, to which a spokesperson said: “As an ethical company, honesty and transparency are our core values.

“Although our products are labelled 'Dermatologically Tested' they are tested to the highest standards either by a dermatologist, or under the strict supervision of a dermatologist who also validates all results and any reactions.

“This means we could label our products 'Dermatologist Tested.' However, we choose 'dermatologically tested' as we believe it's more consumer friendly and follows the industry norms.”

Supershoppers airs on Channel 4 on Tuesday at 8.30pm