Channel 4’s Naked Education sparked fury – I asked my son, 15, to watch it, says Ulrika Jonsson

HOW many boobs, bellies and bums can you fit into one TV programme?

Well, I lost count while watching Channel 4’s Naked Education last week . . . because there were quite a few balls, too.

So, forgive me if I got distracted. It’s a rarity to be exposed to so much nakedness in this country.

Now, it might be the Swede in me that means I’m unfazed by it all but that I also welcome it with open arms.

After all, a naked body is just that. Naked, bare, au naturel.

There is nothing sexual about the body in its natural state.

Come on, people, we all have one. They are all different and come in all shapes and sizes.

Living as we do in a time when our young people are relying on soft and even hard porn for their sex education, normalising nudity is becoming increasingly urgent.

This was largely the premise of the show, to make us all more at ease about naked bodies and to understand their differences better.

Naturally, this was always going to be too risqué for this prudish country and many felt horrified enough to throw their virtuous and offended arms in the air.

Instead of taking a pragmatic view, that showing a handful of kids aged 14 to 16 half a dozen naked bodies might help educate and ­normalise nudity, many came to the conclusion it was some kind of ­perverted sex show and saw it as “filth”.

Folks, this show was brave and unapologetic.

We simply can’t go on as we are with one uptight, puritanical generation turning a blind eye to our young people who are gorging on a diet of online porn for their sex education.

The point of this programme was not for people to concentrate on the baseless assumption that a nude body has a direct correlation with sex, but instead to be myth- busting and attempt to dispel the rumour and prejudice about our bodies.

I asked my nearly 15-year-old son to watch the show with me. He chose not to and promptly left the room.

Although curiosity did seem to get the better of him because he kept popping his head around the corner.

I wasn’t trying to embarrass him. I wanted him to watch and learn.

I’d far rather that than have him scroll through endless, accessible porn sites which will give him a wholly unrealistic view of sex and bodies.

If one in five teenagers watches pornography frequently — and we know it can reach children of primary school age — we have a huge problem on our hands.

And we seem to be out of ideas when it comes to dealing with it.

We know that if they see women being degraded, humiliated, objectified and sometimes even abused, it only stands to follow that the bodies of the people taking part are going to become their expectation.

Young men will see women who have “perfect” shapes — big breasts, big lips and, more often than not, no sign of body hair — and presume all women look like that.

If that is all you see, it becomes your normal.

This means that another body shaped in any other way, with its uniqueness, quirks, blemishes, lines and what we refer to as “imperfections”, will not only be deemed ­unacceptable but become marginalised and stigmatised.

Quirks and foibles

This, in turn, means that in order to try to avoid feeling vilified, judged and disgraced, women will make attempts to conform.

It’s a vicious cycle of degradation, compliance and submission. Women (and perhaps a small minority of men) are altering the way they look so they can try to meet this unrealistic expectation.

No one is ever going to win this battle. Least of all the next generation of young people who might end up rejecting another person’s body for all its quirks and foibles.

Meanwhile, the rest of us are just standing on the sidelines, allowing our impressionable young people (and perhaps even the more impressionable older ones) to create and live in a world built on unrealistic expectations. And, yes, I am concentrating on women and women’s bodies because I know it disproportionately affects us.

Society has always been harder on women.

We desperately need to get comfortable with the fact that all our bodies are different.

We are unique and that’s why we need to rediscover the beauty of all the peculiarities and idiosyncrasies.

Unwanted attempt at a belly laugh

MAISIE SMITH posted a picture on social media of her cradling a somewhat swollen belly with a huge heart emoji across it.

The actress was with her boyfriend Max George (apparently originally from the band The Wanted but nowadays mostly from nothing) looking shocked, with his hand over his mouth.

In many people’s eyes, this was a pregnancy announcement.

Little wonder then that the smug couple faced a backlash when it had been meant as a joke and Maisie’s belly was merely bloated after eating a five-course meal.

I get that people don’t think messing around and pretending to be pregnant is funny. Especially for those who have struggled with, and maybe lost, the battle with infertility.

And also for those die-hard fans who hang on every word and loved-up picture the couple post. It must have felt like an insult and a betrayal.

While I have no desire to defend these two young fools, it should also be possible to josh around a bit once in a while, right?

What really got my goat was the fact that, once again, this publicity-hungry couple did it all for attention.

This was all about creating a stir, getting noticed and making sure they kept their names in the news.

And, naturally, they got what they wanted. It’s just that in my life, they’re very much The Unwanted.