Who is Judge James Robart? US judge who blocked Donald Trump’s Muslim travel ban- all you need to know
HE was the federal judge who temporarily blocked US President Donald Trump's infamous immigration order.
Here's everything you need to know about James Robart who halted the so-called 'Muslim travel ban' back in February and where the US Supreme Court stands on the legal order.
Who is James Robart?
The Seattle judge was unanimously confirmed by the US Senate in 2004 after being nominated by then President George W.Bush.
Before this appointment Robart, 69, had spent 30 years in a private firm known as Lane Powell.
He graduated from Whitman College in Washington, and Georgetown University Law Center.
Douglas Adkins, a former investment banker who has known Robart since childhood, denied the decision to lift the travel ban was for political reasons.
How did Judge Robart block the order?
Robart's temporary restraining order to block the travel ban nationwide.
This was to allow Washington and Minnoesta to mount a legal challenge against the ban, which they argue is unconstitutional and denied people with valid entry documents the right to travel.
In its appeal the Justice Department said that only the US President can decide who enters the country.
The US President can now enforce his 90-day ban on travellers from six Muslim-majority countries.
The Supreme Court has agreed to an emergency measure which will stop anyone from those countries who cannot prove "a bona fide relationship" with anyone already in the US.
But the judgement until the court hears the case in October stopped short of banning all arrivals.
Has Judge Robart made headlines before?
Judge Robart is well known for saying from the bench in 2016 that "black lives matter."
"Forty-one percent of the casualties, 20% people of the population -- black lives matter."
In 2011, Robart put a temporary hold on a state rule change that would have cut government funding for disabled children and families in Washington.
"When faced with a conflict between the financial and budgetary concerns ... and the preventable human suffering," Robart wrote in that opinion, "the balance of hardships tips in the favour of preventing human suffering."