Manchester United star Ander Herrera hit with new setback as Spanish prosecutors want him jailed for four years if found guilty over match-fixing allegations
Spanish midfielder could face time behind bars over an alleged match-fixing scandal during his time at Real Zaragoza
ANDER HERRERA was hit with a new setback last night after it emerged La Liga prosecutors want him jailed for FOUR years over an alleged match-fixing scandal.
Spanish state prosecutors said they were demanding a two-year prison sentence and six-year footballing ban for the midfielder and 35 other footballers in an indictment lodged with a court in Valencia earlier this month.
Two-year prison sentences for first-time offenders in Spain are normally suspended, meaning if Herrera was convicted of sports corruption he would probably escape jail.
But on Monday it emerged lawyers for Spain’s top league were demanding stiffer penalties than the state lawyers if they are found guilty of sports corruption.
They have also launched legal action against the footballers involved in the under-suspicion May 2011 match between Herrera’s old side Zaragoza and Levante.
Respected papers including Valencia-based daily Las Provincias said the four-year prison demands - the maximum sentence possible - were part of the indictment La Liga lawyers have lodged with Valencia’s Court of Instruction Number Eight.
Ander Herrera's 2014 statement
In an ongoing legal process involving Real Zaragoza (Spain), the club I was honoured to play from 12 until 22 years of age, there are 41 people mentioned, of which I am one.
I have never had and will never have anything to do with manipulating match results.
If I am ever called to testify in any judicial hearing, I'll be happy to attend, as my conscience is totally clear.
I love football and believe in fair play, both on and off the pitch.
Ander
16/12/2014
The indictment is also understood to call for the same six-year worldwide soccer ban the state wants them hit with if the footballers including Herrera are convicted at a trial expected to take place at the end of this year or the start of next.
Deportivo La Coruna, the team relegated as a result of Zaragoza’s 2-1 away win against Levante, has yet to submit its indictment.
ANDERNOTHER ONE Jose Mourinho's long history of feuds with club doctors after his Ander Herrera rant
Sources at the club said they were unable to say when its lawyers would lodge their formal accusation in writing.
Under Spanish law lawyers for the club and La Liga can prosecute the footballers in the same courtroom as part of cases that run parallel to the state prosecution.
MORE FOOTBALL FEATURES
It is customary practice for lawyers leading parallel prosecutions to the state one to demand stiffer penalties.
La Liga press officers are yet to make an official comment.
Asked earlier this month about the reopening of the long-running case into alleged match-fixing, a La Liga spokesman said: “La Liga doesn’t comment on stories published in the press.
“If we were make to an official comment, we would do it through the normal channels.”
Newspaper Las Provincias said La Liga lawyers are also demanding fines for the footballers of £2.56million each.
That's more than the £1.7m fines state prosecutors want them to pay if convicted.
The other footballers facing trial along with Herrera on a charge of sports corruption include Atletico de Madrid star Gabi, former Middlesbrough striker Cristhian Stuani and Javi Venta, who ended his career at Brentford.
Zaragoza’s then-manager Javier Aguirre and ex-owner Agapito Iglesias are also being prosecuted.
Spanish anti-corruption state prosecutors have claimed in their 17-page indictment cash paid to nine Zaragoza footballers including Herrera by the club was returned in cash so it could be handed over to the Levante players.
The state prosecutors claim they agreed to "lose" the crunch May 21, 2011 match and help their rivals avoid relegation once they received payment of £852,000.
The suspect match between Zaragoza and Levante hit the headlines earlier this month after it emerged the case had been reopened following an earlier decision to shelve it after a lengthy investigation.
MOST READ IN FOOTBALL
The three Valencia-based judges who ordered the reopening of the case accused the players under suspicion of providing “inconsistent” and “contradictory” statements in their written ruling.
Herrera said earlier this month: “As I stated back in 2014 when this issue was raised, I have never had, and never will have, anything to do with manipulating match results.
“If I am ever called to testify in a judicial hearing, I will be delighted to attend as my conscience is totally clear.
“I love football and I believe in fair play - both on and off the pitch.”
The others facing trial have all denied any wrongdoing.